Nairobi, Kenya| Kenya has defended its decision to engage with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) amid strong criticism from Sudan, asserting that its diplomatic actions are driven by a commitment to regional peace and stability rather than an endorsement of the paramilitary group.
The move has sparked a diplomatic row, raising concerns about Kenya’s role in Sudan’s internal conflict and its broader implications for East Africa’s stability.
Kenya’s Justification: A Neutral Mediator or a Biased Actor?
Kenya’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs which is headed by Principal Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi has reiterated that Nairobi remains a neutral party in Sudan’s ongoing crisis.
The government emphasized that its historical role in hosting Sudanese refugees and facilitating peace processes in the region is a testament to its commitment to conflict resolution.
According to Kenyan officials, engaging with RSF is part of a broader strategy to foster dialogue between warring factions rather than a show of support for the controversial paramilitary force.
“Kenya has always played a crucial role in peacebuilding within the Horn of Africa,” a government spokesperson stated.
“Our engagement with all stakeholders, including RSF, is aimed at finding a lasting solution to the conflict in Sudan.”
Criticism and Concerns: A Risky Diplomatic Move?
Despite Kenya’s assurances of neutrality, critics have raised concerns about President William Ruto’s perceived close ties with RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, commonly known as Hemedti.
Observers argue that such associations may be influencing Kenya’s foreign policy, potentially undermining its credibility as an impartial mediator.
Regional analysts warn that hosting RSF leaders could damage Kenya’s diplomatic standing, particularly with Sudan’s military-led government, which sees RSF as a rebel force responsible for destabilizing the country.
Some have cautioned that Kenya’s engagement with RSF might lead to diplomatic isolation or even economic repercussions from Sudan and its allies.
Sudan’s Strong Reaction: Sovereignty at Stake?
Sudan’s government has vehemently opposed Kenya’s outreach to RSF, calling it a violation of Sudanese sovereignty and an implicit endorsement of terrorism.
Officials in Khartoum argue that engaging with RSF, a group accused of serious human rights violations, undermines efforts to restore stability in Sudan.
“Kenya’s actions are unacceptable and serve only to legitimize a group responsible for atrocities against the Sudanese people,” a Sudanese government official said. “This is a direct interference in our internal affairs.”
Sudan has also called on regional and international bodies, including the African Union and IGAD (Intergovernmental Authority on Development), to take a clear stance against Kenya’s involvement.
Some Sudanese leaders have hinted at diplomatic retaliation if Kenya continues its engagement with RSF.
Regional Implications: Escalating Tensions in East Africa
The growing diplomatic standoff between Kenya and Sudan threatens to strain relations within the East African region.
Kenya’s role as a mediator in Sudan’s crisis is now under scrutiny, with concerns that its actions could complicate peace efforts rather than facilitate them.
IGAD, which has been leading mediation efforts, now faces a dilemma—whether to support Kenya’s approach or distance itself to maintain neutrality.
Meanwhile, other regional players, including Ethiopia and Uganda, are closely monitoring the situation, wary of potential instability spilling over into neighboring countries.
The broader question remains: Is Kenya genuinely working to broker peace in Sudan, or has it inadvertently taken sides in an already complex and volatile conflict?
What’s Next?
As tensions continue to rise, Kenya may be forced to clarify its position further to avoid escalating diplomatic fallout.
The international community, including the United Nations and African Union, may also be compelled to intervene to ensure that peace efforts remain on track.
Should Kenya continue its engagement with RSF, or should it step back to maintain neutrality?
The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether Nairobi’s diplomatic gamble will pay off or backfire.
Share This Post