In a significant stride toward modernizing the judicial system, the Judiciary of Kenya is actively developing an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption Policy Framework aimed at integrating cutting-edge AI tools into court operations.
This initiative, announced by Chief Justice Martha Koome during a high-level forum in Nairobi on August 11, 2025, seeks to enhance efficiency in justice delivery while upholding core principles such as judicial independence, data privacy, and due process.
The policy comes at a pivotal time when digital transformation is reshaping governance worldwide, positioning Kenya as a forward-thinking leader in Africa’s judicial landscape.
The announcement was made amid growing global discussions on AI’s role in public institutions, aligning with Kenya’s broader National AI Strategy 2025-2030, which emphasizes ethical AI deployment across sectors like agriculture, healthcare, and government services.
By leveraging AI, the Judiciary aims to address longstanding challenges such as case backlogs, administrative inefficiencies, and accessibility barriers, ultimately fostering a more equitable and responsive justice system.
The Core Objectives of the AI Adoption Policy Framework
At the heart of this framework is a commitment to ethical and responsible AI integration. Chief Justice Koome elaborated that the policy will guide the use of AI in key areas, including case management, legal research, predictive analytics, and administrative support.
These applications are designed to streamline judicial processes without compromising the human elements essential to fair adjudication.
- Case Management Enhancement: AI tools could automate routine tasks such as scheduling hearings, tracking case progress, and generating summaries, potentially reducing the time from filing to resolution. This is particularly crucial in Kenya, where judicial delays have historically impeded access to justice for many citizens.
- Legal Research and Predictive Analytics: By analyzing vast databases of precedents and statutes, AI can assist judges and lawyers in identifying relevant information swiftly. Predictive analytics, meanwhile, might offer insights into potential case outcomes based on historical data, aiding in resource allocation and informed decision-making. However, the framework stresses that such tools will serve as aids, not replacements, for judicial discretion.
- Administrative Support: From digitizing records to automating transcription services, AI promises to cut down on paperwork and operational costs, allowing judicial staff to focus on higher-value tasks.
Chief Justice Koome underscored the ethical imperatives: “To ensure ethical, safe, and purposeful adoption, we are developing the Judiciary Artificial Intelligence Adoption Policy Framework to guide integration of AI tools while safeguarding judicial independence, data privacy, and due process.”
This approach addresses potential risks, such as algorithmic bias, which could disproportionately affect marginalized communities if not mitigated through rigorous oversight and transparency measures.
The policy’s development reflects a balanced perspective, drawing from international best practices while tailoring solutions to Kenya’s unique context.
For instance, it incorporates safeguards inspired by global frameworks like the European Union’s AI Act, ensuring that AI deployment in the judiciary adheres to human rights standards and promotes accountability.
Promoting Inclusive Digital Transformation
A cornerstone of the Judiciary’s strategy is ensuring that digital advancements benefit all Kenyans, regardless of socioeconomic status or technological proficiency.
Recognizing the pervasive digital divide—exacerbated by factors like poverty, age, and limited internet access—Chief Justice Koome highlighted initiatives to make the system more inclusive.
One key measure is the establishment of ICT help desks at Huduma Centres and court stations nationwide. These desks will provide hands-on assistance for tasks such as e-filing court documents, virtual hearings, and accessing online portals.
“The reality of the digital divide—especially for the indigent, the elderly, and those without digital literacy—means we must provide support,” Koome stated.
This initiative targets vulnerable groups, including rural populations and low-income litigants, who might otherwise be excluded from the benefits of digitization.
By bridging this gap, the Judiciary aims to democratize access to justice, aligning with Article 48 of the Kenyan Constitution, which guarantees the right to access courts.
Experts note that such user-centric approaches could significantly reduce barriers, potentially increasing case resolution rates and public trust in the judicial system.
Overcoming Interoperability Challenges Through Strategic Integrations
While the potential of AI is immense, Chief Justice Koome candidly acknowledged hurdles in achieving a fully integrated digital justice ecosystem. A primary challenge is interoperability—the seamless exchange of data across various justice sector institutions.
Progress has been notable, however. The Judiciary has successfully integrated its systems with the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP), enabling smoother information flow during prosecutions. “We have made significant progress by integrating the Judiciary’s system with that of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP).
Through the National Council on the Administration of Justice (NCAJ), we are working to bring on board other key agencies—such as the police, prisons, probation, and the children’s department,” Koome disclosed.
The NCAJ, a multi-stakeholder body, is spearheading these efforts to create an end-to-end digital chain.
This could revolutionize processes like evidence sharing, prisoner tracking, and probation monitoring, reducing errors and delays. In the long term, full interoperability might cut judicial processing times by up to 50%, according to similar implementations in other jurisdictions.
Investing in Cybersecurity Amid Rising Digital Threats
As the Judiciary embraces AI and digitization, protecting sensitive data has become paramount. Chief Justice Koome addressed the escalating costs and complexities of cybersecurity, noting that cyber threats pose a substantial risk to judicial integrity.
The institution is committing resources to robust defenses, including advanced encryption, regular audits, and threat detection systems.
These investments are essential in an era where data breaches could undermine public confidence and compromise fair trials.
By prioritizing cybersecurity, the Judiciary is not only safeguarding operations but also setting a precedent for other government entities in Kenya’s digital ecosystem.
Regional Collaboration: Insights from the Ethiopia Forum
The AI policy announcement coincided with a bilateral forum between the Supreme Court of Kenya and the Federal Supreme Court of Ethiopia, held in Nairobi on August 11, 2025.
Themed “Regional Experience Sharing on Integrated Case Management System and Electronic Record Management,” the event facilitated knowledge exchange to bolster judicial digitization across East Africa.
Chief Justice Koome engaged with Abeba Embiale Mengste, Vice President of the Federal Supreme Court of Ethiopia, and H.E. Demeke Atnafu, Deputy Head of Mission at the Ethiopian Embassy, alongside Supreme Court Judge Isaac Lenaola.
Kenya offered technical ICT support to aid Ethiopia’s goal of achieving full judicial digitization by 2026. “We hope that the lessons shared during this study visit will contribute to stronger, more resilient, and more people-centred justice in Kenya and Ethiopia,” Koome remarked.
This collaboration underscores the regional dimension of judicial reform, fostering cross-border learning that could inspire similar AI-driven initiatives in neighboring countries.
Broader Implications for Kenya’s AI Landscape
The Judiciary’s AI policy dovetails with Kenya’s National AI Strategy 2025-2030, which promotes agile legal frameworks, ethical AI adoption, and sector-specific enhancements.
In the justice sector, this could lead to innovations like AI-assisted legal aid for underserved populations or automated dispute resolution for minor cases.
However, experts caution that success hinges on addressing ethical concerns, such as ensuring AI algorithms are free from bias and that human oversight remains central.
The policy’s emphasis on data privacy aligns with Kenya’s Data Protection Act of 2019, providing a solid foundation for implementation.
As the framework moves toward finalization, stakeholders—including legal professionals, civil society, and tech experts—will likely play a role in refining it.
This collaborative approach could position Kenya’s Judiciary as a model for AI integration in developing nations, balancing technological progress with the timeless pursuit of justice.
In summary, the AI Adoption Policy Framework represents a transformative step for Kenya’s Judiciary, promising faster, fairer, and more accessible justice.
By prioritizing ethics, inclusion, and collaboration, Chief Justice Koome’s vision ensures that innovation serves the people, reinforcing the rule of law in an increasingly digital world.
Share This Post