In a stunning legal victory that underscores the escalating tensions between Kenyan political figures and law enforcement, the High Court in Kakamega has issued interlocutory orders barring the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) and police from arresting Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP) Deputy Leader Cleophas Malala.
The orders, granted on August 12, 2025, stem from allegations of an unauthorized helicopter landing at the Mumias Sports Complex during the Kenya Secondary Schools Sports Association (KSSA) finals, an incident that has sparked widespread debate on political freedoms, aviation regulations, and potential state harassment.
The ruling, delivered by Justice Bett, explicitly restrains Inspector General of Police Douglas Kanja, DCI Director Mohammed Amin, and any agents acting on their behalf from arresting, charging, prosecuting, harassing, or interfering with Malala’s liberty or that of his associates in connection with the event.
This development comes just days after Malala was summoned by the DCI to appear in Kakamega by August 8, 2025, to provide a statement on what authorities described as a “reckless and dangerous” landing that endangered spectators and violated aviation protocols.
The Incident: A High-Flying Entrance Amid School Games
The controversy erupted on August 3, 2025, during the halftime of the KSSA finals at Mumias Sports Complex in Kakamega County. Eyewitness accounts and viral social media footage captured a helicopter, reportedly carrying Malala, descending dramatically onto the football pitch.
Supporters hailed it as a bold statement against alleged government restrictions, with one post claiming Malala was denied entry at the gate by police, prompting the aerial arrival: “No doors can be closed by the rogue regime.”
Critics, however, decried the move as irresponsible. Western Region Police Commander Issa Muhamud labeled it unauthorized, vowing arrests for Malala and the pilot involved.
The DCI’s summons highlighted potential breaches of the Civil Aviation Act, which mandates prior approvals for non-emergency landings in public spaces, emphasizing risks to the crowd of students, teachers, and fans gathered for the inter-school competitions.
Malala, in his defense, maintained he was merely a passenger and had no control over the pilot’s decisions, arguing the landing did not violate any laws and was a necessary response to access barriers.
Social media erupted with mixed reactions. Posts on X (formerly Twitter) ranged from admiration for Malala’s defiance—”Idle Western Region Police… The regime has lost direction completely!”—to concerns over safety and political grandstanding during a youth event.
The incident quickly amassed thousands of views, likes, and shares, amplifying discussions on whether such actions constitute political theater or genuine infractions.
Legal Maneuver: Edgar Busiega’s Swift Intervention
The restraining orders were secured by Wakili Edgar Busiega, a prominent lawyer representing the DCP and himself a candidate for the party’s ticket in the upcoming Malava Constituency by-election.
Busiega, known for his advocacy in political cases, filed the petition arguing that the threatened arrest was politically motivated and an abuse of power aimed at silencing opposition voices ahead of key electoral contests.
The court’s decision to grant the interlocutory orders—temporary measures pending a full hearing—highlights the judiciary’s role in checking executive overreach, a recurring theme in Kenya’s political landscape.
In a statement shared on social media, Malala expressed relief and defiance: “HIGH COURT ISSUES RESTRAINING ORDERS AGAINST MY IMPENDING ARREST.
This afternoon, the Lawyer representing Democracy for Citizens Party, Wakili Edgar Busiega (DCP Party’s Malava Constituency Candidate in the forthcoming By-election) obtained Interlocutory Orders barring DCI officers from arresting me on allegations of landing a helicopter at Mumias Sports Complex during the KSSA finals.
POLICE are restrained either by themselves, their servants, agents, or any person acting under their instructions from arresting, charging, prosecuting, harassing, intimidating, or otherwise interfering with any of my liberties or my associates.”
The orders remain in effect until further court directions, potentially setting the stage for a protracted legal battle if the DCI pursues charges.
Cleophas Malala: From UDA Stalwart to DCP Firebrand
Cleophas Malala, often referred to as “Hon. Cleo Malalah,” is no stranger to controversy. The former Kakamega Senator and ex-Secretary General of the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) party has reinvented himself as a vocal critic of the current administration since his ouster from UDA in 2023.
In May 2025, he was appointed Deputy Party Leader of the newly formed Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP), widely seen as a vehicle for Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s political ambitions amid rumored rifts within the ruling coalition.
Malala’s career has been marked by high-profile clashes with authorities. Earlier in 2025, he faced an arrest warrant over a political gathering and was briefly detained in April for allegedly scripting a play about the 2024 Gen Z protests for Butere Girls High School—a charge later dropped without prosecution.
These incidents have fueled accusations of targeted harassment, with Malala repeatedly claiming state machinery is being weaponized against him.
His recent activities, including unveiling DCP candidates for by-elections, position him as a key player in Kenya’s opposition dynamics, particularly in the Western region where DCP aims to challenge UDA’s dominance.
Broader Implications: Politics, Aviation Safety, and Upcoming Elections
This case raises critical questions about the intersection of politics and law enforcement in Kenya.
Aviation experts note that unauthorized landings can indeed pose safety risks, but critics argue the swift police response smacks of selective enforcement, especially given Malala’s outspoken criticism of President William Ruto’s administration.
Malala has linked the incident to broader grievances, including compensation for protest victims and calls to arrest Gachagua—ironically challenging the state to act on its own allies.
With the Malava by-election looming, the ruling could bolster DCP’s narrative of resilience against oppression, potentially swaying voters in Kakamega County.
Legal analysts suggest the full hearing might delve into evidence of the landing’s authorization, pilot testimonies, and any political motivations behind the probe.
As Kenya navigates a turbulent political season, Malala’s saga exemplifies the high stakes of dissent.
Will this court order mark a turning point, or merely a pause in the drama? Stay tuned as developments unfold in this captivating blend of politics, law, and aerial intrigue.
Share This Post